|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Chris Huff wrote:
>
> In article <397AE320.4507A0A9@skynet.be>, Fabien Mosen
> <fab### [at] skynet be> wrote:
>
> > Well, I tried this one altogether, but it doesn't suit my current
> > needs : I need to evenly gather intervals along the spline, without
> > having to take care of the spline's "gradation" (the argument before
> > the vector), which is difficult with this "alternate" implementation.
>
> It should be quite easy to make a macro to find a point a fixed distance
> on a spline from a given one...and this syntax looks like it would be
> more easily extended to allow these features to be added.
I gave it another try, but but but :
- it's impossible to pass a spline identifier as a #macro parameter
- it's impossible to #declare a point :
#declare Point = SplineIdent (Value);
I had to go trough sidepaths to achieve what I needed to do (e.g.
creating a temporary spline from a declared array within the macro)
- and I still miss the "linear natural cubic" quality of the other
splines. (and if I write a #macro to evenly distribute the "samples"
along the spline, the parsing times will go trough the roof, as it
does, alas, when using Kari's #macro).
(please consider this as a report, not a complain/request)
Fabien.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |